There was a small dust-up in Louisville last week.
Senator McConnell gave a talk, and afterwards planned a news conference. There, he
tried to bar the editor of a weekly publication in Louisville, LEO,
from the conference and threatened him with arrest if he persisted in
trying to attend.
(LEO stands for the Louisville Eclectic Observer, a sort of Chevy Chaser on steroids.)
All
the reasons given were spurious according to a Sunday column by Joe
Gerth, the able political writer for the Louisville Courier-Journal. (The editor, one Joe Sonka,
who I do not know, has been
critical of the senator in the past---as Sonka also has been of the
Democratic candidate Alison Grimes.)
Now,
any campaign that gets into a hassle with the media is, almost
assuredly, not going to win. We of the media tend to close ranks,
justified or not..and we generally
believe “it’s not a good idea to get into a fight with someone who buys
ink by the barrel.” So Mitch’s campaign has received some black marks
for its high handed tactics in trying to keep a possible critical
reporter from the conference.
However,
Joe Gerth in his column wrote "McConnell had every right to bar Sonka
from the press conference, not a government event.”
I 99% disagree.
The
senator may have called the conference in his capacity as a candidate,
and he may have called it in his capacity as a public official, for his
subject was: veterans affairs
and a new hospital he is trying to get in Louisville.
But,
the US Senate, by its own rules, is a continuing body, unlike the
House. One can infer a Senator is always a Senator, that is, a federal
official, and for a federal official
to bar a reporter is, to me, an obvious violation of the First
Amendment.
Also,
a public official MAY be able to have a reporter arrested (another
First Amendment violation), but I doubt that a candidate can—at least
that poses other problems
and questions.
In
short, it’s not only unwise to take on the media by trying to bar one
of us, it is, I think, illegal, unconstitutional, and fattening. In my
political reporting I have
faced being barred from an office holder’s (and candidate’s) news
conference because I was a broadcaster (though I got my start at a weekly
newspaper), through “separate but equal” news conference just for print
and just for broadcasters...another concept I rejected
and fought…so it’s more than a little disconcerting to read from a
colleague I respect that’s it’s still OK to bar some reporters, but not
others.
It taint!
I'm just sayin'...