The theory, in a representative democracy such as ours, is that the
people elect representatives who will be concerned about their wishes
and needs. (The theory also is if they don’t, they may be turned out of
office...may be.)
So how has our first GOP-controlled legislature in a century done under our theory.
On some things, very well...at least if one assumes the majority did
want, as it voted, the state GOP program (which is not necessarily the
same as the Trump-program---whatever that is today---which may have
driven more Kentuckians to vote Republican than the state GOP’s
platform.)
On others, well let me offer some thoughts:
1—Many citizens, especially those in eastern Kentucky have
complained for years about over-loaded coal truck on narrow roads, never
designed for such loads..and the breakdown of those roads, increasing
costs of maintenance (where maintained), and accidents, often fatal,
caused.
What did our new legislature do?
Raise the load limit for some trucks hauling specific items by 50%.
raised the fee on same, and setting up a study of same. I hope people
in E. Ky. will watch this one carefully.
2—Lots of us, myself included, are tired of politics by the “Golden
Rule”—he who has the gold makes the rules. We want the effect of money
in politics to be more tightly controlled, with much more reporting of
who gives how much to whom?
Our legislature doubled the amount people and corporations may now
give. I don’t remember any of us rallying at the Capitol for this, but
it remains to be seen how this will play out.
3—Kentucky has had a moratorium for years on building nuclear power
plants, but our representatives in Frankfort ended that. (Obviously
they didn’t have any testimony in committee about Chernobyl.) Their
theory was we need more power options as coal declines. Maybe so, but I
don’t remember any bills designed to help make coal “cleaner” as its
advocates (and myself) contend it can be...which should also help coal
regain markets.
I am aware KET aired a very interesting program recently on new
ways to generate atomic power claimed to be safer, cleaner, and cheaper.
Maybe so; but for now color me both skeptical and wanting to keep UN-proven nuke power out of my home state.
4—It’s hard not to agree that mine inspections work to make coal mining
safer. One way to keep coal keeping our lights on is by making that
industry safer. Yet our ladies and gentlemen in Frankfort cut the
number of state required inspections in half. Maybe their theory is that
The Donald, who says he wants to bring back coal and increase jobs,
will do it for us. I have my doubts but a few more inspector jobs won’t
help this basic Kentucky industry’s employment very much.
I’m sure our GOP legislative members can, and will cite legislation
they consider beneficial to the Bluegrass state, but, on balance, let
us not forget there is, arguably, another side.
I'm just sayin'...
No comments:
Post a Comment