Taking a page from Democrat guru James Carville’s playbook, mild
mannered incumbent Andy Barr became an attack dog from the start of KET’s 6th District debate Monday, charging squeaky clean newcomer Amy
McGrath with being just as “dirty” as he was; if that meant running
attack ads.
So the 2 top candidates went back and forth on TV ads, and their
sources, and who was “more positive” while the issues got less time (and
the Libertarian candidate, Frank Harris, got less time, as he
noted—while making some very cogent points. Go to his website for more,
he urged voters.)
When Andy & Amy did debate, it was a mixed bag. House Republicans
tried over 30 times to repeal Obamacare, but finally realized it was
more popular than they thought, and came up with a new “scheme” (and
that’s what it is, not a plan) to “improve” it. Hopefully voters will
see through that.
The two did debate extensively the Trump tax cuts (which a vast
majority of economists feel will aid only the top richest people, not
the famed “middle class” and lower.) McGrath insisted the bill will come
due in 3 years, while Harris correctly pointed out its toll on the
rising national debt, once a mantra of the GOP, but apparently no more.
The 2 disagreed over veterans as well. Barr supporting vouchers
for vets to go to any private MD. McGrath countered that, as with a lot
of bills in Congress, those vouchers were not funded. Barr interrupted to
say they were. I haven’t had time to check CQ here, hopefully one of
our local media will do so and let us know.
Barr insisted McGrath’s plans would cost trillions, she denied it;
Harris said a pox on both your parties; that's what causes the
national debt to rise and a chief reason I left the GOP! Barr said he tried
to hold down the debt by supporting spending cuts but was in the
minority of his party. Amy countered that Mitch and others will now
support cutting social security, medicare & aid, and all those
programs Dems hold dear, and Andy fired back “scare tactics.” (We shall
see, remember this night, folks.)
McGrath opposes Trump’s tariffs, as bad for farmers; Barr supported
the China tariffs saying we have been ripped off, Harris quietly
disagreed and brought up our foreign policy problems, saying its not
terrorism but resources (especially oil) that got the US into “our
longest war” in Afghanistan, and how would Americans like it if Russia
had bases in Canada and Mexico, as the US had around the world.
It was after all, only 3 people and an hour, so maybe we shouldn’t
have expected some thoughts about poverty, dark money, the electoral
college, election security, etc. etc. etc., but we do thank KET for at least
this one opportunity to see 3 of the 4-5 candidates in action.
Now then....on to Marsy's Law:
I am going to vote against the proposed amendment to the
state constitution. It’s supposed to guarantee victims’ rights in the
justice system, but please read the jumbled, extremely vague description
of the amendment which will be on your ballot before deciding, and see
if you think that wording really conveys trying to help crime victims.
If you read the even more jumbled and vague full wording of the
amendment you might wonder even more.
How all those lawyers in the legislature could come up with such
ridiculous wording is beyond my comprehension. It is, to use a phrase that has
killed many a bill in other states’ legislatures I have covered "a
lawyers bill” and I predict it will lead to many unnecessary, expensive
lawsuits, without accomplishing its stated aims. Besides, opponents
claim, many of the supposedly “new” rights for victims are already in
our constitution.
Marsy's Law is a bad attempt to do a good thing. We should start over after it’s rejected.
I'm just sayin'...
No comments:
Post a Comment