No, not the people running the show, but my colleagues in the media covering it.
I’ve reported on 14 conventions and this was not good…starting with the mainstream decision not to do major coverage in prime time.
NBC trumpeted “unsurpassed coverage”---all squeezed into one hour at 10pm, as did CBS/ABC. So on the first day, with the floor fight over rules change, there was no over the air coverage then. (It was, I am told on “streaming”===NOT the same.) Nor did they summarize this fight in the UN-coverage at 10.
CBS’s sage, Bob Schieffer (24th convention) was promoted once, and NEVER got on. He was brought on too late 2 other times and his good remarks were cut short.
But the really bad coverage belonged to PBS (trying to co-operate with NPR and not succeeding.) My basic watching was C-SPAN, because they focus on the podium and speakers and PBS, because I like Shields and Brooks.
Judy and Gwen were totally lost first night It has been four years since their last convention, but…these are supposed to be pros. This type of coverage is not their long suit.
Sitting next to each other they complained they couldn’t hear each other because the noise from the floor. This is NOT new. And might have been helped by the right audio mix, but it wasn’t...even a day or so later. And it took til the final night to get the right headsets on guests---but not on Gwen and Judy. Was that because of hair and make-up issues?
And one of the NPR experts mis-identified a major senator.
As to the 3 major cable networks, I have come up with a rule. The amount of wisdom and important information offered is in inverse proportion to the number of panelists. CNN loves 6-8 panelists. Good info gets lost.
Good to see Brian Williams back on MSNBC, which had similar panelists problems.
Well, the practice and rehearsal is over. Let’s hope coverage of the Dems' convention goes better.
After all, as Editor Jason Robards once opined on the Watergate coverage..”Only the future of the Republic is at stake!”
I'm just sayin'...